Boostnote nextcloud software#
Boostnote nextcloud code#

Org format is kind of a better and more powerful Markdown. It's unfortunate that a broken mode can completely hose the entire editor in this day. Not to mention, the last three times I tried to do Go development in Spacemacs it would freeze in an infinite busy loop. The abstraction falls apart quickly when you try do do something more powerful (like opening the package manager). Yes, they are more user friendly, but they still do not follow many of the common OS UI models, and you still are interacting with a single-purpose programming language for any customization.

Boostnote nextcloud software#

Org mode is one of the few unique bits of software available only on Emacs, but you can get 80% (if not more) of its functionality with markdown notes and regular email/calendaring software for 20% (if not less) of the learning curve.Д®DIT: And I'm not ignoring Spacemacs and its kin. Tricky tasks on remote servers, editing files on remote servers? Most places prefer immutable servers, which run peer reviewed remedial scripts via Ansible/Puppet/Chef/Salt. Patches over email or chat? I've only seen that use at any scale with Linux kernel development. Respectfully, you're describing workflows that very few people use today. * Replace tmux and tmuxinator with emacs-server. * Use emacsclient -tramp when you're SSH'd on a remote box to transparently edit in your local emacs. * Use org mode with org-babel and TRAMP to create interactive notebooks carrying out tricky tasks directly on the remote server from within emacs. Generate snippets on the fly in your team's chat from the currently selected text. * Use one of the IRC clients or emacs-slack to do the same thing. * Use mu4e and magit integration to seemelessly send and apply patches and pull projects and todo items directly from email. * Organize your tasks and projects with org-mode and work seemelessly with your team by syncing with org-trello.

Boostnote nextcloud code#

I mean if all you want is a text editor, some SCM integration, some build tool integration, syntax highlighting, and code completion then going with a specialized tool just for that is a good choice.Д«ut the power of Emacs is that it can do nigh-anything and everything is a few lines of elisp away from being tightly integrated. Spacemacs, Prelude, and Scimacs are all good options depending on your use-case. You're ignoring distributions of Emacs which are designed to solve this problem by bundling and pre-configuring everything. I'm surprised more people don't do the same. I find myself more eager to write things down. If Gollum stops being maintained, I can use whatever the next best markdown renderer is. If there's a feature I wish it had, I can write a quick bash script to implement it. Edited with vim and a few bash scripts, rendered with a custom deployment of Gollum. Plain timestamped markdown files linked together. It's silly to use software that isn't making that same investment.ДЄfter trying Evernote, Workflowy, Notion, wikis, org-mode, and essentially everything else I could find, I gave up and tried building my own system for notes. When you write things down, you're investing in your future.

At best it's open source and the maintainers will lose interest in a few years.

I've given up on using any sort of branded app for notetaking.